Points of Tension between Neutrality and Ethics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15203/4172.vol53.2024Abstract
The present article deals with the relation between neutrality and political ethics, a matter so far rarely discussed in academic literature. The article addresses, in a general way, the existing tensions between neutrality and ethics in international relations and international law. It particularly points to potential contradictions between the obligations deriving from the UN – Charter binding all member states and Austria’s international obligations under the law of neutrality. This contribution examines three current cases where points of tension between Austrian neutrality and political ethic clearly emerge. The first instance refers to the question of Austria’s participation in the demining projects currently underway in Ukraine, the second case relates to Austria’s voting pattern in the EU bodies regarding financial and military assistance to Ukraine. The third case concerns the exact purview of the so-called Irish clause in the EU-Treaty of Lisbon which provides for a specific obligation of assistance in case an EU member state becomes victim of an armed aggression. The Irish clause provides an exemption for neutral states from the duty to render assistance as the provision makes it explicitly clear that this does not prejudice the specific character of the security and defense policy of certain member states. The article concludes by calling on both political scientists and international law experts to take a closer look at the difficult relation between ethics and neutrality in the future.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Franz Cede
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/3.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.
The OZP is the authorized quarterly publication of the Österreichische Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft (ÖGPW, Austrian Political Science Association)
The author of an article (in case of multiple authors: the corresponding author, responsible for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors) accepted to be published in the OZP hereby acknowledges the following Copyright Notice:
- The author retains the copyright to the article.
- It is the responsibility of the author, not of the OZP, to obtain permission to use any previously published and/or copyrighted material.
- Publication of a submitted text is dependent on positive results from the peer reviewing. In such a case, the OZP editors have the right to publish the text.
- In case of publication, the article will be assigned a DOI (digital object identifier) number.
- The author agrees to abide by an open access Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY nc) license. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article in any non-commercial way, so long as appropriate credit is given to the author and source of the work.
- The license ensures that the author’s article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. In order to facilitate distribution, the author agrees that the article, once published, will be submitted to various abstracting, indexing and archiving services as selected by the OZP.
- In addition, the author is encouraged to self-archive the article, once published, with reference to the place of the first publication.
- After the contribution appears in the OZP, it is still possible to publish it elsewhere with reference to the place of the first publication.
- The finished article, if published, will include a correspondence address (both postal and email) of the author.
- If written under the auspices of a grant from one or more funding agencies, such as FWF (Austrian Science Fund), ERC (European Research Council), and Horizon 2020 (EU Framework Programme), an article accepted for publication has to be deposited in an Open Access archive. The OZP’s archiving policy is compliant with these provisions. (In case the article derives on funding from a different source, the author is responsible to check compliance of provisions.)