Converting to Open Access. The Austrian Journal of Political Science (OZP) as a case study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.3184.vol49iss3

Keywords:

Academic Publishing, Austria, Open Access, Peer Review, Social Sciences

Abstract

Open Access is a simple idea that has resulted in a confusing landscape of business models, competing policy prescriptions, and vested interests. Academic debates about the pros and cons of Open Access publishing often lack insights into the operational needs for setting up an Open Access publication. This is true particularly for the social sciences, where experiences with Open Access from the production side still seem sparse. Covering the period between 2010 and 2015, this article recapitulates one of the few cases where an existing academic journal in political science has been converted to an Open Access publication. The Austrian Journal of Political Science (OZP) is an Open Access journal since 2015; and it was the academic community that conducted the conversion process. Remaking the OZP may thus entail some broader lessons for the social sciences communities about what is important in Open Access publishing.

Author Biography

  • Thomas König, IHS

    Thomas König is researcher and head for strategy and scientific services at the Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna (IHS). He was member of the editorial team of the OZP between 2012 and 2016 and led the FWF-funded project that converted the journal to Open Access.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-30

Issue

Section

Discussion

Similar Articles

41-50 of 86

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.