The Role of Recognition in Kelsen’s Account of Legal Obligation and Political Duty

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.3657.vol51iss3

Keywords:

democracy, obligation, law, recognition, Kelsen, sovereignty

Abstract

Kelsen’s critique of absolute sovereignty famously appeals to a basic norm of international recognition. However, in his discussion of legal obligation, generally speaking, he notoriously rejects mutual recognition as having any normative consequence. I argue that this apparent contradiction in Kelsen’s estimate regarding the normative force of recognition is resolved in his dynamic account of the democratic generation of law. Democracy is embedded within a modern political ethos that obligates legal subjects to recognize each other along four dimensions: as contractors whose mutually beneficial cooperation measures esteem by fair standards of contribution; as autonomous agents endowed with equal rights; as friends who altruistically care for each others’ welfare, and as fallible agents of diverse experiences and worldviews.

Author Biography

  • David Ingram, Loyola University of Chicago
    Professor of Philosophy

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Section

Special issue article

Similar Articles

1-10 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.