History, institutions, and selectivities in historical-materialist policy analysis: A sympathetic critique of Brand’s ‘State, context and Correspondence‘

Authors

  • Bernhard Leubolt Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.259.vol43iss3

Keywords:

Selectivities, historical materialism, institutionalism, state theory, Policy-Analysis, Selektivitäten, Historischer Materialismus, Historisch-materialistische Policy Analyse, Institutionalismus, Staatstheorie

Abstract

This contribution shares Ulrich Brand’s reliance on critical theories of the state and hegemony. Based on three points of criticism, the author argues for a better elaboration of the context of policy making. First, he proposes to consider a broader range of theoretical currents than the interpretive accounts introduced by Brand: (1) A strategic-relational interpretation of historical institutionalism will be introduced, (2) featuring the concept of ‘periodisation’ for a systematic understanding of historically evolving structures. In addition to the introduction of a broader range of theoretical currents, (3) Brand’s proposed concept of ‘selectivities’ will be further refined and specified to be better able to grasp the workings of the ‘institutional condensation of the correlation of forces’ in the policy cycle. The proposed conceptualisation of historical-materialist policy analysis will be exemplified by a short stylised example of research on equality-oriented policies in South Africa.

Author Biography

  • Bernhard Leubolt, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien

    Department Sozioökonomie

    Institut für Regional- und Umweltwirtschaft

Downloads

Published

2014-09-03

Issue

Section

Discussion

Similar Articles

1-10 of 83

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.