Hans Kelsen’s Political Theology

Science, Pantheism, and Democracy

Authors

  • Benjamin A. Schupmann Yale-NUS College My ORCID is https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-150X - this system will not accept it for some reason ("ungueltig") So I put it here.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.3787.vol51iss3

Keywords:

Hans Kelsen, Political Theology, Democracy, Relativism, Science

Abstract

This article argues that the field of political theology should pay greater attention to Hans Kelsen. Kelsen developed a unique, epistemological form of political theology. For Kelsen, a subject’s beliefs about what is knowable determines the form of theology and jurisprudence both. He argued that subscribing to a modern scientific epistemology led one to embrace a pantheist theology and democracy. Drawing on the structural analogy between theology and jurisprudence, Kelsen offered an alternative theory of democratic legitimacy. He argued that pantheism’s immanent conception of the divine, of truth and right, is a model for understanding democratic legitimacy. Democratic proceduralism is valid because it generates valid law relatively and immanently, not absolutely and transcendently.

Author Biography

  • Benjamin A. Schupmann, Yale-NUS College My ORCID is https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7686-150X - this system will not accept it for some reason ("ungueltig") So I put it here.

    Benjamin A Schupmann is an Assistant Professor in the Division of Social Sciences at Yale-NUS College in Singapore. He is the author of Carl Schmitt’s State and Constitutional Theory: A Critical Analysis. He is currently writing a book analysing how democratic constitutions can be designed to prevent democratic backsliding without compromising democratic values themselves.

Downloads

Published

2022-09-30

Issue

Section

Special issue article

Similar Articles

71-80 of 104

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.