Stuck in Escher’s staircase. Leadership, manipulation and democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15203/ozp.596.vol39iss3Schlagwörter:
Leadership, manipulation, heresthetic, disequilibrium, accountabilityAbstract
Joseph Schumpeter entwickelte eine berühmte Kritik über die klassische Demokratietheorie, wobei er die Grundhypothesen der Theorie ablehnte. Dieser Artikel will die Widersprüche erläutern, die die innere Logik der Aggregativen Theorie der Demokratie schwächen. Erstens wird erläutert, dass im Gegensatz zur Beschreibung der Wirtschaft durch die Equilibrium- Theorie in der Volkswirtschaftlehre, die Welt der Politik durch Disequilibrium gekennzeichnet ist. Es wird gezeigt, wie Multidimensionalität und Rikers Heresthetik die Rahmenbedingungen des Medianwählermodells widerlegen. Zweitens wird in Anlehnung an die Saliency-Theorie und an Susan Stokes’ „Changing Calculus of Support“-Hypothese, ein neues Modell der demokratischen Konkurrenz dargestellt, welches das Problem des politischen Ungleichgewichts aufgreift und eine Alternative zum Medianwählermodell repräsentiert. Das „Changing Calculus“-Modell erklärt das Wesen politischer Prozesse und trägt damit zum Verständnis der Zusammenhänge zwischen politischer FührerInnenschaft, politischen Wissens und der politischen Situation bei. Drittens untersucht der Artikel eine wichtige, normative Folge des „Changing Calculus-Modells“. Die Manipulation der Agenda und der Urteilsdimension durch politische AkteurInnen schwächt den Wirkungsmechanismus des „Friedrich’s Law“.Downloads
Ausgabe
Rubrik
Forschungsartikel zum Schwerpunkt
Lizenz
The OZP is the authorized publication of the Österreichische Gesellschaft für Politikwissenschaft (ÖGPW, Austrian Political Science Association)
The author of an article (in case of multiple authors: the corresponding author, responsible for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors) accepted to be published in the OZP hereby acknowledges the following Copyright Notice:
- The author retains the copyright to the article.
- It is the responsibility of the author, not of the OZP, to obtain permission to use any previously published and/or copyrighted material.
- Publication of a submitted text is dependent on positive results from the peer reviewing. In such a case, the OZP editors have the right to publish the text.
- In case of publication, the article will be assigned a DOI (digital object identifier) number.
- The author agrees to abide by an open access Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-SA) license. The license permits any user to download, print out, extract, reuse, archive, and distribute the article under the same license, as long as appropriate credit is given to the author and source.
- The license ensures that the author’s article will be available as widely as possible and that the article can be included in any scientific archive. In order to facilitate distribution, the author agrees that the article, once published, will be submitted to various abstracting, indexing and archiving services as selected by the OZP.
- In addition, the author is encouraged to self-archive the article, once published, with reference to the place of the first publication.
- After the contribution appears in the OZP, it is still possible to publish it elsewhere with reference to the place of the first publication.
- The finished article, if published, will include a correspondence address (both postal and email) of the author.
- If written under the auspices of a grant from one or more funding agencies, such as FWF (Austrian Science Fund), ERC (European Research Council), and Horizon 2020 (EU Framework Programme), an article accepted for publication has to be deposited in an Open Access archive. The OZP’s archiving policy is compliant with these provisions. (In case the article derives on funding from a different source, the author is responsible to check compliance of provisions.)
